Flying Shear Servo Motor Sizing: 6 m Cuts on a 120 m/min Line, Step by Step
By the ONX Control engineering team · Published:
In short
The servo motor of a flying shear is sized from the two moves the carriage makes in every cycle: forward (acceleration, cutting in sync with the line, deceleration) and the return to the start position. These moves give the peak torque, RMS torque, maximum speed and inertia ratio. This guide works through a machine cutting 6 m on a 120 m/min line, with a 600 kg carriage and a 1 s cut. Result: a 3.0 s cycle, a 2.62 m stroke, at most 1700 rpm at the motor, about 50 Nm RMS and about 82 Nm peak torque. A motor with 48 Nm continuous torque is not enough. The pairing ONX often uses on such lines, a Unidrive M701 drive with an HPB PM-109-20 servo motor (142 Nm, 2000 rpm), fits with a wide torque margin and a 9.3:1 inertia ratio.
Result of the example
- Cycle time
- 3.0 s
- Stroke (of 4 m travel)
- 2.62 m
- Maximum motor speed
- 1700 rpm
- RMS / peak torque
- 49.5 / 81.7 Nm
Example machine: data and assumptions
The carriage is driven by a timing belt from a pulley on the gearbox output; the belt runs 1:1 between two equal pulleys. With a 500 mm pulley circumference, each turn of the gearbox output moves the carriage 500 mm. Rows marked "Data" come from the machine, rows marked "Assumption" were chosen for this example; replace them with measured values for your machine.
| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Line speed | 120 m/min = 2.0 m/s | Data |
| Cut length | 6000 mm | Data |
| Cut (synchronised) time | 1.0 s | Data |
| Carriage mass (including belt) | 600 kg | Data |
| Mechanical travel of the carriage | 4.0 m | Data |
| Gearbox | 1:5 | Data |
| Belt and pulleys | 1:1, two pulleys, 500 mm circumference (r = 79.58 mm) | Data |
| Forward acceleration / deceleration | 6.5 m/s² | Assumption (chosen in section 3) |
| Return profile | 1/3 acceleration, 1/3 constant speed, 1/3 deceleration | Assumption |
| Dwell | 0 s | Assumption |
| Friction coefficient | 0.05 | Assumption |
| Total efficiency | 0.90 (gearbox 0.95 × belt 0.95) | Assumption |
| Pulleys | 2 × 3 kg, solid disc approximation | Assumption |
| Gearbox inertia (motor side) | 0.0010 kg·m² | Assumption |
| Cutting force component along the carriage axis | Not included | Assumption |
Cycle time
Because the line never stops, the time between two cuts is the cut length divided by the line speed. In this time the carriage must go forward, make the cut and return to its start position.
Forward move: acceleration, synchronised cut, deceleration
The carriage accelerates from standstill to line speed, travels with the material during the cut and then stops. During the 1 s cut the carriage covers 2.0 m; this is the largest part of the stroke.
When synchronisation starts, the blade must be exactly above the cut point. While accelerating the carriage covers 0.31 m and the material 0.62 m, so the carriage starts when the cut point is 0.31 m behind the blade. In CODESYS SoftMotion, MC_GearInPos or MC_CamIn calculates this start point itself.
Why not use the full 4 m of travel?
A longer stroke means gentler acceleration, but the longer the forward move, the less time is left for the return. Using all 4 m brings the forward acceleration down to 2.0 m/s², and the forward move alone then takes 3.0 s: no time is left to return.
The table shows how stroke, return speed and motor torque change with the forward acceleration (motor: HPB PM-109-20). Peak torque is lowest when the forward and return accelerations are close to each other; 6.5 m/s² was chosen for this example. The stroke stays at 2.62 m, leaving 1.38 m of the 4 m travel as margin at both ends.
| Forward accel. | Stroke | Return time | Return speed | Return accel. | Motor speed | RMS torque | Peak torque |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 m/s² | 3.00 m | 1.00 s | 4.50 m/s | 13.50 m/s² | 2700 rpm | 73.9 Nm | 164.0 Nm |
| 5.0 m/s² | 2.80 m | 1.20 s | 3.50 m/s | 8.75 m/s² | 2100 rpm | 57.1 Nm | 108.1 Nm |
| 6.0 m/s² | 2.67 m | 1.33 s | 3.00 m/s | 6.75 m/s² | 1800 rpm | 51.0 Nm | 84.6 Nm |
| 6.5 m/s² | 2.62 m | 1.38 s | 2.83 m/s | 6.14 m/s² | 1700 rpm | 49.5 Nm | 81.7 Nm |
| 7.0 m/s² | 2.57 m | 1.43 s | 2.70 m/s | 5.67 m/s² | 1620 rpm | 48.6 Nm | 87.5 Nm |
| 8.0 m/s² | 2.50 m | 1.50 s | 2.50 m/s | 5.00 m/s² | 1500 rpm | 48.0 Nm | 99.3 Nm |
| 10.0 m/s² | 2.40 m | 1.60 s | 2.25 m/s | 4.22 m/s² | 1350 rpm | 48.7 Nm | 122.8 Nm |
Gearbox 1:5, dwell 0 s. RMS torque hardly depends on the acceleration: on this machine it is set by the 1 s cut and the 3 s cycle.
Return move
In the remaining time the carriage travels 2.62 m back. A 1/3 profile (one third acceleration, one third constant speed, one third deceleration) gives a good balance between peak speed and acceleration for a given time.
Motor speed
Each pulley turn is 0.5 m and the gearbox is 1:5, so each motor turn moves the carriage 0.1 m. The highest speed occurs on the return, not during the cut.
Load inertia reflected to the motor
A linearly moving mass becomes rotary inertia with the square of the pulley radius, and is reflected to the motor divided by the square of the reduction ratio. Almost all of the load is the carriage.
The square of the ratio is decisive here: with a 1:7 instead of a 1:5 gearbox the load inertia at the motor drops from 0.1537 to 0.0789 kg·m², but at the same speed the motor turns 1.4 times faster.
Motor torque in each segment
Motor torque has three parts: the force that accelerates the carriage, friction, and the torque needed to accelerate the motor's own inertia and the gearbox. When the motor drives, efficiency increases the torque demand (÷η); when it brakes, it reduces it (×η). The calculation below is for the forward acceleration with an HPB PM-109-20 motor (rotor inertia 0.0165 kg·m²).
| Segment | Time | Carriage accel. | Motor torque |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward acceleration | 0.31 s | +6.50 m/s² | +81.7 Nm |
| Synchronised cut | 1.00 s | 0 | +5.2 Nm |
| Forward deceleration | 0.31 s | −6.50 m/s² | −59.1 Nm |
| Return acceleration | 0.46 s | −6.14 m/s² | −77.4 Nm |
| Return constant speed | 0.46 s | 0 | −5.2 Nm |
| Return deceleration | 0.46 s | +6.14 m/s² | +55.6 Nm |
The 5.2 Nm during the cut is friction only; the cutting force is not in this table.
RMS torque and motor selection
What heats the motor is the root mean square of the torque over the cycle (RMS). The peak torque must stay below the motor's short-time capacity, the RMS torque below its continuous torque, and the maximum speed within its speed limit. Three candidate motors were calculated with the same cycle, each with its own inertia.
| Motor and gearbox | Catalogue continuous / peak | Calculated RMS / peak | Utilisation | Speed (max / rated) | Inertia ratio | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estun EM3G-75D, 1:5 | 48 / 120 Nm | 48.2 / 79.7 Nm | 100% / 66% | 1700 / 1500 rpm | 13.1:1 | Not suitable |
| Control Techniques Unimotor hd HD-190UDF, 1:5 | 85 / 255 Nm | 47.8 / 79.2 Nm | 56% / 31% | 1700 / 2000 rpm | 14.9:1 | High inertia ratio |
| HPB PM-109-20, 1:5 | 142 / 383.4 Nm | 49.5 / 81.7 Nm | 35% / 21% | 1700 / 2000 rpm | 9.3:1 | Selected |
EM3G-75D and HD-190UDF values are taken from the ONX Motion Sizing database on this site, PM-109-20 values from the HPB PMA catalogue (download centre); verify them against the manufacturer's current data sheet and torque-speed curve before selecting.
On the EM3G-75D the RMS torque equals the continuous torque (100%) and 1700 rpm is above its rated speed; the HD-190UDF covers torque and speed but its inertia ratio is 14.9:1. Selected pairing: Unidrive M701 drive + HPB PM-109-20, 1:5 gearbox. ONX uses this pair on most flying shear and flying saw lines of this kind. The PM-109-20 looks oversized on torque, but its rotor inertia brings the inertia ratio down to 9.3:1; on a 600 kg belt-driven carriage this directly affects tuning and vibration. The drive is selected from the motor's RMS and peak current: about 20 A continuous and 33 A peak in this cycle.
Braking (regenerative) energy
The carriage stops twice per cycle; its kinetic energy flows back into the drive's DC bus. It is either turned into heat in a braking resistor or passed to other axes on a shared DC bus.
What to watch for in the field
- Calculate the shortest cut length separately: with the return acceleration held at 6.5 m/s², the shortest cut length for this profile is about 5.9 m. For cuts shorter than 6 m, either the acceleration goes up or the cut time must be shorter.
- The cut time affects the design more than anything else: a 1 s cut means 2 m of stroke and a third of the cycle. As the cut time gets shorter, stroke, return speed and RMS torque all drop.
- Add the cutting force component along the carriage axis (especially for saws) to the synchronised segment.
- The belt's tensile rating must carry at least the 4.2 kN of the forward acceleration with a safety margin; belt stretch shows up as position error and vibration.
- An S-curve (jerk limit) reduces vibration but raises the peak acceleration for the same time; if you choose an S-curve, redo the calculation.
- If the encoder or measuring wheel that reads the line speed slips, the cut length drifts: the master signal must be coupled to the material without slip.
Checking with ONX Motion Sizing
ONX Motion Sizing calculates a point-to-point move. For a flying shear, enter the forward and return moves separately: the peak torque and speed the tool reports can be compared with this guide, and the RMS torque is found by combining both moves over the cycle as in section 8. The tool's default inertia ratio limit is 10:1, so expect a warning with the 1:5 gearbox.
| Field | Forward move | Return move |
|---|---|---|
| Application | Rack & Pinion (equivalent of a belt-driven linear axis) | Same |
| Moving mass | 600 kg | 600 kg |
| Pinion diameter | 159.15 mm (500 mm / π) | 159.15 mm |
| Friction coefficient / efficiency | 0.05 / 0.90 | 0.05 / 0.90 |
| Reduction | 1:5 | 1:5 |
| Profile | Custom Trapezoid | Custom Trapezoid |
| Travel distance | 2.62 m | 2.62 m |
| Move time | 1.62 s | 1.38 s |
| Accel / decel time | 0.31 s / 0.31 s | 0.46 s / 0.46 s |
Calculate with your own values
Enter your own line speed, cut length, carriage mass and reduction ratio in ONX Motion Sizing and get a motor and gearbox proposal from the catalogue. If you would like to discuss the flying shear control and commissioning as well, talk to our engineers.
Calculate with ONX Motion SizingFrequently asked questions
Is peak torque or RMS torque decisive when sizing a flying shear motor?
Both are checked, but because a flying shear moves back and forth all the time, RMS torque is usually decisive. In this example the peak torque is 82 Nm and the RMS torque 50 Nm; a motor with 120 Nm peak but 48 Nm continuous torque easily covers the peak, yet is not suitable because of heating.
How does the cut time affect the calculation?
The carriage travels at line speed for the whole cut: at 2 m/s a 1 s cut means 2 m of stroke. Once the cut time is taken out of the cycle, less time is left for acceleration, deceleration and return, which is why the cut time has the largest effect on RMS torque and return speed.
Why is it not better to use the carriage's full travel?
A long stroke lowers the forward acceleration but lengthens the forward move and shortens the time left to return. In this example, using all 4 m would make the forward move alone take 3 s. The best point is where the forward and return accelerations are close to each other.
What should the inertia ratio be?
There is no hard limit; the stiffer the mechanics, the higher the ratio can be. On belt-driven axes, below 10:1 makes tuning easy. The effective way to lower the ratio is a higher reduction, because reflected inertia falls with the square of the ratio.
Does the motion have to be an electronic cam?
No. The speed profile can be trapezoidal as in this guide; in CODESYS SoftMotion, MC_GearInPos handles the synchronised start and MC_CamIn runs the whole cycle as one cam profile. A cam is more flexible for short and constantly changing cut lengths.
Let's size your flying shear together
Share your line speed, cut length range, carriage mass and mechanics; we will come back with a motor, gearbox, drive and CODESYS-based control proposal.
Estun Automation
CODESYS
Crevis
Nexcom / Nexcobot
Leroy-Somer
Servo Systems
AC Drive + Motor
DC Drives
Smart PLC
Panel PC / IPC
Remote I/O